Rand Paul Supports Mitt Romney?!

Republican Senator Rand Paul, son of libertarian godfather Ron Paul, this month controversially endorsed Mitt Romney’s bid for the presidential nomination. POLSIS PhD candidate Jake Diliberto examines the consequences for Paul Sr.’s grassroots libertarians of what some in the movement see as an act of treachery by one of their favourite sons.

This news is troubling for the libertarian coalition. While Rand’s father may no longer be in the race for the Republican Party nomination, he is continuing to amass delegates ahead of the Republican Party Convention in August, as a show of libertarian strength within the GOP.

Rand Paul is a central figure in the libertarian movement. He is regarded as his father’s heir apparent and a potential future candidate for president. However, his endorsement of Romney has been highly divisive amongst libertarians. Hard-liners will not tolerate any political support for Romney. Moderate conservatives are still supporting him, but Neo-Cons hate him.

In a recent Reality Report he did his best attempt to persuade libertarians that he is trying to keep to his principles, whilst simultaneously playing the partisan political game. This has done little to satisfy the people in the Paul/Libertarian caucus, who have been speaking out.

Interestingly, Rand Paul himself is unlikely to suffer any damage from the endorsement. He has plenty of time before his next election and his state, Kentucky, loves him. Indeed, many see the endorsement as shrewd political positioning aimed at boosting his chances of a successful bid for the GOP nomination in 2016. The real predicament is for his father’s libertarian caucus. I see the libertarians as having three options:

  • Accommodate: They can take this as Rand playing good politics, continue to support Ron Paul’s delegate strategy, and hope Rand can have an important voice for the future.
  • Divide and conquer: They could push for more Libertarian Party candidates, continue to deny their support for the GOP, and grow the support for their cause. This would divide the GOP for several years, and could have a blowback effect that might be devastating. On the other hand, it could motivate conservative voters to back candidates like Sen Paul, Rep. Jusin Amash, Gov. Gary Johnson and others who are emerging as leaders of the libertarian cause within the GOP.
  • Give way: Libertarians are not known for their extraordinary compromising skills. This particular avenue is highly unlikely, but Libertarians could adapt to the Rand Paul approach, accept the Romney candidacy, and hope to exert influence by working with the establishment GOP rather than against it.

Senator Paul is very influential amongst libertarians.  He has put a stake in the road that they will either tolerate or reject.  That said, the problem is not Paul’s; it’s the libertarians’. It’s hard to see how the movement can continue to attract so much support if their candidates alienate the base by endorsing establishment Republicans such as Romney.

About these ads

1 Comment

Filed under Comment and analysis

One response to “Rand Paul Supports Mitt Romney?!

  1. catastrophic peril against this coetirnus financial system is no longer evident. No benefits will be paid for, or to the Cabinet members or administrators.The Secret Service that administers protection for the President and or Vice President shall remain on duty to perform all said functions. All necessary precautions shall not be infringed upon but all extra activities outside of the grounds of the White House are hereby terminated and will not be paid for.We The People also at this time wish to administer pay cuts to the United State Senate and the House of Representatives to reflect a two (2) day work week. All Czars and Czar post created by past Presidents and the current President are hereby terminated immediately, their service is no longer affordable nor necessary. No unemployment benefits or any other compensation will be paid and it will be necessary for those that held the office of Czar, to return to their civilian jobs.All benefits paid to the Senators and House of Representatives are hereby terminated and We The People will no longer provide housing, any and all meals, snacks, drinks of any kind, cars, jets, free taxi rides, chauffeured limousines, exercise equipment, nor the use of exercise facilities or any other non governmental facility. Any and all other functions outside of the government work necessary to be performed by said individuals shall not be allowed and will not be paid for. Any and all permanent and or part time retirement benefits and insurances which have been paid for by We The People are hereby null and void and terminated. Any and all equipment, furniture, houses, cars, airplanes and or anything bought and paid for by We The People is therefore demanded to be returned, sold and monies placed back into the accounts of We The People.We The People at this time will not allow military cuts or interventions of pay to any military personal. The use of the military is a necessity to safety and welfare of this country. If therefore you, Mr. President, deem it necessary to state that pay might be withheld from said personal, it becomes the responsibility of We The People, to demand that said military personal be brought back into the boundaries of United States of America. We will not allow you, Mr. President, an elected representative of We The People, to manipulate the monies of those that protect this country. You are hereby notified of our disapproval of such maneuvers and any use of threats of non payment to the military will not be tolerated.Mr. President, you have also stated that you might not send social security payments out to those that are entitled because our country does not have the funds to pay those benefits. If, Mr. President that is the case, and there are no monies available to pay any and all Social Security payments. Then you Mr. President and all past Presidents presently living should be charged with theft in office and or embezzlement or some other form of maleficence. That money, labeled as social security, is monies paid by and deducted from pay checks of We The People. Those monies were supposed to have been held in a separate account up to and for said persons that would and could retire and collect what they had paid into said account. It is therefore necessary that you clarify your statements on Social Security payments before We The People, ask for charges to be filed against all persons that have been responsible for the theft of said monies if in fact such a theft has taken place.You, Mr. President, Vice President, Cabinet members, all staff members, White House employees, Senators and Representatives are hereby notified and thank you for sharing in this sacrifice.Current score: 0

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s