Tag Archives: Birmingham

Student Conference: Cosmopolitan Dimensions

Last week, POLSIS held its Second Annual Student Conference, an event organised for students, by students. It was a day to remember, writes POLSIS MA student and conference organiser Marianna Karakoulaki.

On a rainy summer day on 7th June, students from the School of Government and Society gathered in Muirhead Tower, for the Second Annual Student Conference. It was the second year in a row that the student conference had been put on and this year we moved one step further by including students, beyond POLSIS, from the International Development Department (IDD) and the Institute for Local Government Studies (INLOGOV). This year’s conference further established the event and was something many students anticipated with much excitement from the beginning of the academic year.

This year the conference was named “Cosmopolitan Dimensions”, a general title some would argue, that could include every discipline in social sciences. Still, that was the intention of this year’s committee; they wanted to make everyone from the School feel welcome and comfortable in participating.

But let’s get into the details before running out of space describing the conference in general. As I mentioned, the conference was designed in such a way in order to cover various disciplines in the social sciences. The papers that were selected by the organising committee covered three topics; the first one focused on ‘Political Economy and Security’, the second on ‘Contemporary Britain’ and the last one on ‘Gender and Politics’. I can barely say which panel was the best and which presentation stood out simply because everything was perfect! The students – most of them undergraduates – presented their best work and all of the papers were of a very high standard.

The highlight of the day was the keynote speaker – Ramita Navai – who kindly accepted our invitation. Ramita, a freelance journalist who works for Unreported World (Channel 4) enthusiastically joined us for one of the most interesting Q&A sessions I have ever attended. It was really surprising to see how many questions the audience had and how engaged they were with the discussion during the whole session. Ramita gave us a very clear view of the troubles and difficulties she has experienced during her career as an undercover journalist in the world’s most dangerous places. But not only did the audience enjoy this session but so did our keynote: talking to Ramita a couple of days later she told me that the questions were really interesting and the audience was really engaged “which was great!”

The second ‘extra’ session included another Q&A panel – a ‘Question Time’ event with representatives of the Student Political Societies. Apart from the expected controversy among them, both the participants and the audience seemed very engaged and I can honestly say that we all experienced a lively political debate!

The end of the conference found us all relieved from all the stress and anxiety of presenting in public. However, the Head of the Department, Colin Thain, was left with the toughest job – he was the one to decide on the best three papers that would win the ‘million dollar prize’ – OK maybe not a million dollars but rather £100! The top three papers from the conference were delivered by Amanda Moorghen, James Bowker and Jon Robinson.

The feeling that I have a week later – and I am sure the rest of the committee feels the same – cannot be described with only one word. I couldn’t be more thankful to everyone that participated and to everyone that came for making the Birmingham experience worth remembering!

Hopefully the Second POLSIS Student Conference will be followed by a ‘third’, ‘fourth’ and ‘fifth’ so that a few years from now it will be a tradition. Then all of us who participated will be able to say proudly “I was a part of that too!” It is an experience that all students should have during the course of their studies and it is an experience worth remembering!

Marianna Karakoulaki.

2 Comments

Filed under Past Events

Rand Paul Supports Mitt Romney?!

Republican Senator Rand Paul, son of libertarian godfather Ron Paul, this month controversially endorsed Mitt Romney’s bid for the presidential nomination. POLSIS PhD candidate Jake Diliberto examines the consequences for Paul Sr.’s grassroots libertarians of what some in the movement see as an act of treachery by one of their favourite sons.

This news is troubling for the libertarian coalition. While Rand’s father may no longer be in the race for the Republican Party nomination, he is continuing to amass delegates ahead of the Republican Party Convention in August, as a show of libertarian strength within the GOP.

Rand Paul is a central figure in the libertarian movement. He is regarded as his father’s heir apparent and a potential future candidate for president. However, his endorsement of Romney has been highly divisive amongst libertarians. Hard-liners will not tolerate any political support for Romney. Moderate conservatives are still supporting him, but Neo-Cons hate him.

In a recent Reality Report he did his best attempt to persuade libertarians that he is trying to keep to his principles, whilst simultaneously playing the partisan political game. This has done little to satisfy the people in the Paul/Libertarian caucus, who have been speaking out.

Interestingly, Rand Paul himself is unlikely to suffer any damage from the endorsement. He has plenty of time before his next election and his state, Kentucky, loves him. Indeed, many see the endorsement as shrewd political positioning aimed at boosting his chances of a successful bid for the GOP nomination in 2016. The real predicament is for his father’s libertarian caucus. I see the libertarians as having three options:

  • Accommodate: They can take this as Rand playing good politics, continue to support Ron Paul’s delegate strategy, and hope Rand can have an important voice for the future.
  • Divide and conquer: They could push for more Libertarian Party candidates, continue to deny their support for the GOP, and grow the support for their cause. This would divide the GOP for several years, and could have a blowback effect that might be devastating. On the other hand, it could motivate conservative voters to back candidates like Sen Paul, Rep. Jusin Amash, Gov. Gary Johnson and others who are emerging as leaders of the libertarian cause within the GOP.
  • Give way: Libertarians are not known for their extraordinary compromising skills. This particular avenue is highly unlikely, but Libertarians could adapt to the Rand Paul approach, accept the Romney candidacy, and hope to exert influence by working with the establishment GOP rather than against it.

Senator Paul is very influential amongst libertarians.  He has put a stake in the road that they will either tolerate or reject.  That said, the problem is not Paul’s; it’s the libertarians’. It’s hard to see how the movement can continue to attract so much support if their candidates alienate the base by endorsing establishment Republicans such as Romney.

1 Comment

Filed under Comment and analysis